Wednesday, August 20, 2008
I will be back
The sequel continues elements of the original story, often with the same characters and settings.
Sequels did made very late entry in Bollywood. I mean, there were few instances like Satyajit Ray’s Apu trilogy ( Pather Panchali , Aparajita and Apur Sansar ), Harmesh Malhotra’s failed a sequel Nigahen after the Nagina but nothing after that for a long period whereas sequels were the ‘the thing’ in Hollywood. “The Godfather”, “Harry Potter”, “Mission Impossible”, “Matrix” ,“Spiderman”, “Batman”, “Superman”, “Star Wars”, and “The Terminator” are just the names few names.
Even talking about Bollywood Barring exceptions like Mahesh Manjarekar’s Hathyaar (sequel to ‘Vastava’) and Nagesh Kukunoor’s Hyderabad Blues 2 (sequel to ‘Hyderabad Blues’) most of the sequels in Bollywood are hit. The list includes “Phir Hera Pheri” and “Krrish”, “Munnabhai MBBS”, “Dhoom”, “Sarkar”, “hanuman returns” and many films are in pipeline.
Why there is the sudden rush for making sequels?
Sequel is just extension of an existing concept. The initial concept is already bought by public. [Untill now sequels are made only if the first part of the runs successfully]. As the original film is popular and people have already accepted the characters, half the job of selling sequel is done. Even if the quality of the sequel is not comparable to its original film, goodwill of the original film will guaranty most of the ticket sales for sequel.
A hit film raises the credibility of crew helping in the financial issues for the sequel. Few companies are into business of purchasing a sequel option. Generally sequels option expires after 3-4 years, meaning sequel has to be made soon after original movie because people tend to forget quickly. Purchasing a sequel gives you all the rights to make a sequel. You may or may not make it actually.
Current trend is to make stories keeping in mind the possible future sequel.
Mamma, I want the Kkrish Tiffin box
Read here, all exhaustive history of most Bollywood merchandising. This post will look this topic from angle of the three stakeholders involve in the merchandising.First the movie producers, the direct benefits are profits. Movies make additional revenue by selling the writes to the merchandise manufacturers for a fee. This happens most commonly with apparels, toys. Secondly, market is flooded with the movie merchandising, adding to movie publicity and recall. Third the movie remains alive in the form of the merchandise years after the movie is out of theatres.
Second stakeholder is merchandise manufacturer. Merchandise manufacturing is a big business in itself with many business houses entering into in. Movie merchandising is most of the time is success. There are instances like the toy Tutu sold extensively but film Na Tum Jaano Na Hum flopped miserably.
Finally, what does customer get out of purchasing movie merchandise?
Before going to the benefit part of customer let’s see which segment is being targeted by the movie merchandising. Looking at the nature of merchandise like fashion apparels, toys, stationary items, school items, jewellery etc. The segment that is being targeted is children and youth. Who have biggest influence of movies? Kids have competition among them to grab latest hanuman book. They don’t want to lag behind. Same with the youth they know what is happening from the films and don’t want to feel old fashioned. By grabbing film merchandise people seek attention and pride to have the esteemed belonging.
Few Hollywood movies earn more revenue from the merchandise than ticket sell. Merchandising concepts are planted right from the scripting point with consultation from the manufacturer. Signs are that the trend will soon hit in India.
Monday, August 18, 2008
Catch them online

More or less every movie website has same structure. You will hear title track or theme music in background when you open the site. You can see the sections like storyline, director’s note, cast and crew. Websites also provide downloading/viewing of movie teasers and wallpaper.
For whom?
Website promotion is mainly targeted at net-savvy, young, urban Indians. Their decisions to watch movies are influenced by online movie reviews. They prefer multiplexes for watching movies and most importantly they have disposable income to spend of leisure activities. Hence an easiest way to tap this net-savvy target segment is by catching them online.
Is it better than existing promotions?
Conventional promotions like TV/print ads have very small life. Whereas for movie websites there is no limit on life period, we can have a site running forever. Hence TV/Print ads stay only for first few weeks of release whereas website can do the job of maintaining excitement thereafter.
Websites are targeted ads rather than a mass ad. Logic behind this is the way of reaching at the movie website, either by googling it or clicking its ad-link from another website. No one is forcing us to watch it unlike TV or Newspaper where we don’t have control over content.
Cost for creating/hosting a website is very small compared to the total promotional budget, making websites one of the cheapest promotional way. Typically a superior site with decent multimedia grabs attention of person visiting the site for significant duration. Good music and interactive media of the website ensures complete attention of visitor.What’s next?
Few sites went one step ahead by providing Links to official movie blog, Links to Orkut/Facebook communities. These virtual places provides movie-fans space to gossip about the movie which act as viral and word-of-mouth marketing.
Read next Blog for: Another recent phenomenon – Celebrity blogging
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Art of Product Placements
- That provides only clear visibility (product/brand name shown)
- That is used in scene
- That has spoken reference
- That provides hands-on use and mentioned by a main star
Saif Ali khan was shown as Times of India cartoonist. ‘Hum Tum’ cartoons were published in TOI even before film was released and continued to appear till the movie was running. These cartoons were successful in creating curiosity about movie. Movie was hit on box-office. And cartoon strips were smash-hit and are forwarded over e-mails till the date. Recent news is that Yash Raj films are making cartoon series of Hum Tum over television. Film has 2-3 highest points, film freezes at those points. Photo-clicking sound along with ‘Kodak’ moment appears on these screens.
I liked the films over its Hollywood inspiration ‘When Harry met Sally’. Film didn’t do foolishness of placing newspaper now-and-then neither hero explained the efficiency of Kodak cameras. Everything seemed real and nobody was making any conscious efforts of popping up products. Movie also had Saif eating Lays and Rani drinking Fanta. Both the brands are completely match to their personality and didn’t look odd to eyes. All the brands were blended so well with the films story that it becomes the part of the movie. Product placements of such type benefit both the parties’ brands as well as the movie. I am of the personal opinion that product placement should not play with film’s aesthetics.
But now comes the main question, will the advertisers be agree to spend lot of money for glimpses of their product in some corner of film-frame which may or may not catch viewer’s attention.
This lead to the fundamental question, ‘Does subliminal advertising work?’
Come on we don’t copy! It is inspired.
I initially thought of writing on all the movies those were copied from the Hollywood. I sat and Listed few names which I knew. After searching on internet, I found that this research work has already been done.
Link 2 : Bollywood films and plagiarism
Link 3: Whose movie is it anyway?
Reasons
- You do not require brain.
- Many producers want to repeat the success of the films that is hit somewhere. It is highly likely that the remake will also be hit. Most reasons of copying are same as motive behind masala movies (Read to my earlier post on psyche behind masala movies)
- There is no threat of punishment from coping, you simply copy and forget.
Actually, one unsuccessful suing attempt was done in past on ‘Karishma’ serial telecasted on ‘Sahara Television’. Author ‘Barbara Taylor Bradford’ claimed the serial was based on her novel.
Author lost, thanks to Sahara lawyers. It saved India’s face in front of entire world. Let’s hope judiciary systems will favour India like this always.
Yeh India hain bhai.. yahan toh aisehich chalta hain…
Pouring huge amount of money in movies is increasing but the quality is not. Many failed to understand what happened to the Indian cinema which had glorious past of creating great films which reduced to dumb, senseless bollywood masala movies. It is not that India was deprived of talent for all these years. Everything was done with some purpose … and that is business. Let’s see how.
Customer is god.
But we need consumer. Who is consumer of movies? If you think that the answer is everyone. It is not. Everybody watch a movie but not everyone is paying for it. From a producer’s point of view the very first customer is distributors, whose customers are theatre owners whose customers are people who go to theatres to watch movies. So, ultimate consumers who matter the most for producers are people who go to theatre for watching movies.
[For those who are unheard of this marketing lingo, consumer and customer are two different concepts. To explain in simple words, ‘customer purchase a product’ and ‘consumer is consumes it’. For example, Mother buys dairy milk chocolate for kids. Here, Mother is customer for dairy milk and kids are consumers.]
The point that I want to make out from above discussion is movies are NOT made for people who watch it on television channels or on pirated CDs. But for the people who take trouble to come to cinema hall to watch it.
Well that doesn’t mean that this is ‘the’ only way of making money. Producer can sell overseas rights, broadcast rights, music rights and etc. But money earned by the other means is function of success at the box-office or to be precise prospects of the film’s success at the box-office. As many of the rights are sold before movie is released.
What consumer wants?
[I tried to get hands on some study on which did profiling of people who go to theatre and what takes them to theatres. Unfortunately I didn’t found anything. So I will make a profile based on my understanding.]
Prominent segments are college-crowd at weekdays and families at weekends. Both of the segments look at the movies as mean of entertainment. They want spend some time away from their routine problems. Movies show them what they just can dream about. Big houses, trip to foreign, sensuous girls, comedy situations, item number, and good wins over bad. But this what the consumer wants? No one is interested in watching the cruel social reality of what is happening around. That they see anyways on newspapers and channels. They are in cinema hall for 3 hours of fun. And no one can do entertainment job better than a masala movie. Considering that Indian viewer is not yet mature it makes logically sensible to put your money in masala movies.
[Let’s finish the post with bollywood-style-ending…]
Masala movies are past, now things are changing….
Off-beat movies like ‘Lagaan, ‘Rang De Basanti’, ‘Swades’ ‘Chak De India’ and ‘Taare Zameen Par’… are well accepted by audience….
This will prompt more film makers to take up and this will bring revolution …
Movie lovers will be freed from evil crutches of masala movies…
And Indian cinema will get back its past glory….
OKEY… it was just a too-good-end-to-be-real… But isn’t what movies do too… selling dreams...
Saturday, August 16, 2008
I have got the formula…
A typical story for a masala movie will have a handsome-young hero with muscles-and-dancing-abilities, young-beautiful heroin with perfect-figure-and-insufficient-cloths, dream sequence at foreign locations, cunning villain creating numerous hurdles for hero, songs after regular interval as short toilet breaks, a comic character which pops out time-to-time, an item-number from item-number-specialist [ ;)] , a deadly fight sequences with villain, ends of hero-heroin meeting each other and living happily thereafter.
Some tried to have uniqueness by trying permutation-combination of rich-guy-poor-gal, poor-guy-rich-gal. Some movies changed villain by parents, gangster, dacoit, politician, police, second-girl-in-love-tringle, second-guy-in-love-tringle.
A (mis-)management case : Is there really a formula?
Some years ago management guru (self-proclaimed!) Arindam Chaudhuri (IIPM fame) announced in the press that he has found a magic formula to succeed at the box office. And his new movie is going to be a smash-hit. Read the old news article here
http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/890576.cms
Story after that: He released an extremely unbearable movie called Rok Sako To Rok Lo (RSTRL). The movie was a super-duper-flop everywhere. And with this so called scientific approach, exhaustive marketing research, focus groups analysis, failed along the movie miserably.
Very few films try break out from this year-old success (so called??) formula of masala movie to make different kind of movies. But a point to ponder is success ratio of these off-beat films is much higher than all the masala movies made ever.
Read next post for: Psyche behind Masala Movies.













